1 |
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:23:19 +0200 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | We really should figure that stuff out before we start integrating an |
5 |
> | externally written package manager we have no influence on whatsoever |
6 |
> |
7 |
> How much influence does your typical Gentoo developer or user have over |
8 |
> the development of Portage? Please consider long-standing feature |
9 |
> requests such as :slot and [use] deps in your answer. |
10 |
|
11 |
That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but |
12 |
Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's |
13 |
control. If the paludis devs decide to change the license for paludis |
14 |
1.0 to a commercial one, Gentoo would be unable do anything about it |
15 |
(except fork the last GPLed version). If the paludis devs decide to |
16 |
terminate all ricers with RTFM, Gentoo can't do anything about it. I |
17 |
guess the list could be continued with other examples. |
18 |
I'm not saying the paludis devs may do such a thing, but they could |
19 |
and Gentoo couldn't do anything about it. |
20 |
As long a project is within Gentoo, every developer does at least have |
21 |
some influence, be it by voting the council or whatsoever. |
22 |
|
23 |
As for your long standing feature requests, this has nothing to do |
24 |
with the issue, unless you're trying to bash the portage team, which |
25 |
has nothing to do with this thread. |
26 |
|
27 |
cheers, |
28 |
Wernfried |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org |
32 |
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org |
33 |
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org |