| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:42, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>paludis/packages: |
| 5 |
>>-*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 |
| 6 |
>>*sys-apps/paludis |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Is there any reason that portage and paludis can not live together. As |
| 10 |
> this basically blocks any kind of migration or backwards compatibility I |
| 11 |
> see this as a very serious roadblock to the acceptance of paludis as a |
| 12 |
> supported (secondary) package manager. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is not a block. -*>=sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.22 means that the |
| 15 |
depedency on portage is no longer in the system class (base defines it |
| 16 |
as such). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Kind Regards, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Simon Stelling |
| 22 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives