| 1 |
El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
| 4 |
> >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking |
| 5 |
> >> stabilizing the new virtuals, and thus, converting the tree, and |
| 6 |
> >> also blocking stabilization of the already converted packages |
| 7 |
> >> (gnome seems to have some) pending for 3 months already |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> thanks, samuli |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > This makes me wonder about the real status of some of this arches. |
| 13 |
> > I know that now we will probably see how Agostino goes ahead and |
| 14 |
> > does all the work (that is nice and I really welcome his work |
| 15 |
> > trying to keep this arches in shape), but also makes me thing if |
| 16 |
> > makes sense to keep this agostino-dependency for this arches more |
| 17 |
> > and more time. What will occur if he is not around sometime? :/ |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> We have been through the same discussion not so long ago and the |
| 22 |
> result was to start dropping the ~m68k, s390 and sh to ~testing[1]. In |
| 23 |
> the thread that started it all[2] there has been no resistance about |
| 24 |
> dropping the keywords of these arches on $subject and here we are |
| 25 |
> again discussing the problem. Here[3] you can see council's decision. |
| 26 |
> I quote here just for fyi: |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> "In summary: |
| 29 |
> - m68k, s390, sh: will be dropped to unstable keywords globally. |
| 30 |
> - alpha, ia64: Maintainers can remove older stable versions according |
| 31 |
> to the "package-by-package" proposal. |
| 32 |
> - sparc: No action. |
| 33 |
> " |
| 34 |
> So unless I make a mistake, you are free to start dropping alpha, ia64 |
| 35 |
> to ~arch. For ppc,ppc64 and sparc it's probably best to resurrect the |
| 36 |
> old thread and possible have add it to the agenda for the next meeting. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/88183 |
| 39 |
> [2] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/277054 |
| 40 |
> [3] |
| 41 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary.txt |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
The problem arrives when even core components like udev takes so long to |
| 45 |
be handled :/ (and situation would be much worse if Agostino doesn't |
| 46 |
have time to make his mass stabilizations... well, each time I report a |
| 47 |
stabilization bug that affects me I cross my fingers expecting ago has |
| 48 |
enough time to handle them ;)) |
Archives