1 |
On Monday 13 May 2002 15:46, Bob Phan wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Personally, I feel an even more elegant way to solve this, that would |
4 |
> benefit more than just custom categories, is to allow CONFIG_PROTECT |
5 |
> to contain individual files as well directories, which is very simple |
6 |
> to implement. |
7 |
|
8 |
For this particular problem, I feel a CATEGORIES variable is more appropriate, |
9 |
since this will allow new categories to be taken into account. Protecting |
10 |
files is a good solution for other profile related problems. |
11 |
|
12 |
> |
13 |
> It would also be nice to be able to un-protect files and |
14 |
> subdirectories of protected directories, but that probably wouldn't be |
15 |
> as simple to implement. |
16 |
|
17 |
That is possible, there is a mask variable (I don't recall the name) |
18 |
|
19 |
Paul |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
23 |
Junior Researcher |
24 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |