Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mailing lists
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 04:02:08
Message-Id: 01080413025200.00700@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: mailing lists by Daniel Robbins
1 On Saturday 04 August 2001 11:49, you wrote:
2 > On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 08:30:57PM -0600, Pete Gavin wrote:
3 > > Hi,
4 > >
5 > > I think this has been brought up before, but I think the gentoo-dev
6 > > mailing list would be more helpful if we could split it up into
7 > > something like gentoo-dev (for developer questions and discussion, no
8 > > ebuild/package related stuff or non-developers allowed to post),
9 > > gentoo-ebuild (for ebuild submittal and announcement, anyone can
10 > > post), and gentoo-user (for everything else). Would this be alright?
11 > >
12 > > Pete
13 > > <alkaline@g.o>
14 >
15 > I will do it if I can get some kind of assurance from our developers that
16 > the gentoo-ebuild and especially the gentoo-user mailing lists will be
17 > moderated by at least some of the developers. Dan Armak can handle a good
18 > amount of gentoo-ebuild
19 Yes, I'm willing to become the official gentoo-ebuild moderator/handler.
20
21 > , but I really need someone who's willing to
22 > moderate gentoo-user. A moderator for gentoo-dev would be nice too :)
23 >
24 > Maybe you could ask on CVS over the weekend and see if anyone is interested
25 > in moderating the mail lists.
26 >
27 > Also, I'll be creating team mailing lists and the # Author: comment in all
28 > new ebuilds will specify the team, i.e.: system@g.o,
29 > infrastructure@g.o, etc. It's too hard to track the specifc author
30 > anyway; we'll just track the team. It'll be up to the team to keep their
31 > own internal organization for all the ebuilds that belong to them. We'll
32 > probably change the # Author: comment to # Maintainer: system@g.o,
33 > for example. This'll work for me.
34 >
35 > I'm going to cc: this to gentoo-dev.
36 >
37
38 So, from one public mailing list (gentoo-dev) we'll have:
39 -dev, -user, -ebuild: 3
40 -system, -desktop, -server, -tools, -infrastructure, -security: 6
41 plus the one-directional -announce and -cvs lists.
42
43 So they'll probably be pretty spare to begin with, but that's probably to the
44 best. Certainly it will make discussions much more focused.
45
46 BTW, drobbins, what do you think about the propositions made in the
47 "maintainership and commit policy" (was: xchat anomalies)?
48
49
50 --
51
52 Dan Armak
53 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
54 Matan, Israel