| 1 |
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 23:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:31:17 -0100 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > No, this cannot have any backward application, nor should it. All |
| 6 |
> > contributions made while respecting the guidelines, are valid |
| 7 |
> > contributions. Yes, it prevents any further contributions in the |
| 8 |
> > future - be it package updates, new features, bug corrections or |
| 9 |
> > security updates. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So you consider it acceptable to leave Gentoo users open to security |
| 12 |
> holes and crashes because of some personal dislikes? |
| 13 |
As a member of the security team I don't see us banning patches from any |
| 14 |
developer based on their behaviour. So let's just cut of that part of the |
| 15 |
discussion here. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz) |
Archives