| 1 |
On 09-07-2007 11:47:45 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 18:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > you proposing we rearchitect it all or just for testing purposes before going |
| 4 |
> > live ? i can see both ... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I am proposing rethinking all of it. My current thoughts run something |
| 7 |
> like this: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
[snip] |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> I'm creating an overlay for these profiles while I work on them, so we |
| 12 |
> can easily get input on them and track the changes. I'd like to get |
| 13 |
> input on this schema for the profiles before I commit anything and am |
| 14 |
> definitely interested in getting input from anyone with any profile |
| 15 |
> experience. Using an overlay will allow us to make changes (to base, |
| 16 |
> for example) without disrupting the tree until we're ready. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
While you're at it, in my own garden[1] I use some profile structure as |
| 19 |
well. This is not relevant to the big public, I guess. However, might |
| 20 |
be worth to keep it in the back of your head when designing new profile |
| 21 |
structures, such that it in some way or another can be put into the |
| 22 |
model using the same structure. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] |
| 28 |
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/profiles/default-prefix |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 32 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives