| 1 |
> As others have said, look at using udev to name your network devices in |
| 2 |
> a persistant manner, it's the best solution. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Yes, i agree. But i have thought about it, and i wonder, if it's going |
| 5 |
to work if: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
1. udev loads the modules which results in a "natural order": saying |
| 8 |
eth0 and eth1 are used. |
| 9 |
2. my udev-rules say, that the network-card which has the "natural name" |
| 10 |
eth1 has to be called eth0 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Will udev rename the card eth1 to eth0 and the card eth0 to eth1? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe udev also loads the modules in a way, so that the cards don't get |
| 15 |
any "natural name" by the kernel and instead, the udev-daemon has the |
| 16 |
full power to assign the names. |
Archives