Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo's plan to remove .la files: eutils function
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:48:43
Message-Id: 1288532895.18073.5.camel@yamato.local
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's plan to remove .la files: eutils function by Thomas Sachau
1 Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 13.26 +0100, Thomas Sachau ha scritto:
2 >
3 >
4 > The line should exclude those .la files, which contain
5 > "shouldnotlinkto=yes" or directly use the
6 > autotools-utils eclass as suggested, since it already contains this
7 > functionality together with a
8 > nice USE flag (static-libs) for it.
9
10 This would exclude all plugin .la files which are also NOT NEEDED in
11 most cases.
12
13 And I'm starting to get angry at people who install .la files for PAM
14 modules… or Ruby extensions… or Python modules… and so on so…
15
16 _Most of them must die on a package-by-package basis._
17
18 --
19 Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
20 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
21
22 If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
23 it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature