1 |
>From my experience so far with gentoo... I have a feedback. |
2 |
A couple of times I wished the categories were more specific, Once I was |
3 |
looking for a juke box.. I wished I could search for all the sw simlar |
4 |
to xmms. And the other time it was sound editing rosegarden like |
5 |
software. Most of the time I am just curious how many varieties in a |
6 |
perticular app category are available... a catagory like gams could |
7 |
definately use it. |
8 |
Hope this helpls |
9 |
Spundun |
10 |
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 11:31, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: |
11 |
> On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 19:12, Vadim wrote: |
12 |
> > I think that Gentoo needs some better way of describing packages. For example, |
13 |
> > I think it would also be a good idea to add longer descriptions, like those |
14 |
> |
15 |
> It's a nice idea. On the theme of metadata that runs throughout the |
16 |
> entire distribution however there is a common argument against it. The |
17 |
> current information points the user to the package homepage which is |
18 |
> considered as the most uptodate and proficient resource of that |
19 |
> information. This also prevents information duplication and the need to |
20 |
> maintain it. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |