1 |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:00:16 -0500 |
3 |
> "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> However, what alternative do we have to throwing the patches up in a |
6 |
>> devspace? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> mirror://gentoo, aka /space/distfiles-local/ |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
That isn't a great option. This has been discussed previously: |
12 |
|
13 |
https://lists.gt.net/gentoo/dev/224673?do=post_view_threaded |
14 |
|
15 |
https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/index.html#suitable-download-hosts |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
I would point out that a devspace isn't the only alternative - |
19 |
anything stable would be reasonable. |
20 |
|
21 |
Also, to avoid an additional reply I'll just comment on the |
22 |
reservations about hosting stuff on github. While a Gentoo archive |
23 |
would certainly be preferable, keep in mind that when we're talking |
24 |
about hosting a src_uri the only function github is actually |
25 |
performing is to act as a webserver. There are a lot of reasonable |
26 |
objections to depending on github since it is closed-source, but most |
27 |
of those objections pertain more to the issue/pull-request tracking |
28 |
features of github. If all you're using it to do is to host URLs or |
29 |
repositories then I suspect that all the associated software is |
30 |
open-source anyway, most likely (though I do not believe github |
31 |
discloses what they actually use). Most of us probably wouldn't |
32 |
notice if a random src_uri in our repository is pointing at an IIS |
33 |
server, for example. I'd just be careful about knee-jerk reactions. |
34 |
That aside, there are a lot of good reasons to host our own archives, |
35 |
with the unreliability of ANY external host being one of them. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Rich |