1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
On 16/10/13 12:01, Duncan wrote: |
7 |
> If it's a core requirement, no problem. But the further from core |
8 |
> requirement it gets the more sensitive infra seems to be about |
9 |
> non- trivial space requirements, and any way you look at it, 30 |
10 |
> gigs of rainbow tables are both non-core and non-trivial, |
11 |
> especially with the split package and no-mirror on the big package |
12 |
> solution, so... |
13 |
|
14 |
No, that's fine. I wanted to check, because I don't take the |
15 |
resources for granted, but I do see us as providing a mirroring |
16 |
service for open source projects (to a degree), and no one so far had |
17 |
put forward an opinion about how infra would feel about it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Anyway, Francesco made an excellent point, and I think I'll be going |
20 |
with the additional bash script for grabbing the large tables... |
21 |
|
22 |
Thanks for you help everyone! 5:) |
23 |
|
24 |
Mike 5:) |
25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
27 |
|
28 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlJfGKkACgkQu7rWomwgFXo7dwCeIgp2WTS5vaBpG+zNTzdw0Q6g |
29 |
4ocAoLUlnjIcZzcWzJ8Va1P5mdx65moP |
30 |
=Y1m5 |
31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |