1 |
Mike Auty posted on Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:15:10 +0100 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> First off, thanks everybody for the suggestions. It seems like people |
4 |
> aren't keen to mirror the large tables on our mirrors, but no one's |
5 |
> mentioned a reason for not doing so. Is there an infra reason behind |
6 |
> that or did everyone just take my caution and run with it? |
7 |
|
8 |
Based on previous related discussion, it's simply a reluctance to throw |
9 |
that much extra resource requirements at the folks who are after all |
10 |
/volunteering/ to host gentoo mirrors. We're invited guests whose |
11 |
continued presence is at their pleasure, and we shouldn't be taking undue |
12 |
advantage of the privileges we're given or the resources required to |
13 |
support us as such. |
14 |
|
15 |
If it's a core requirement, no problem. But the further from core |
16 |
requirement it gets the more sensitive infra seems to be about non- |
17 |
trivial space requirements, and any way you look at it, 30 gigs of |
18 |
rainbow tables are both non-core and non-trivial, especially with the |
19 |
split package and no-mirror on the big package solution, so... |
20 |
|
21 |
Beyond that, I suppose it'd be a topic for the mirror list. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |