| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:21:25 -0800 |
| 4 |
> Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Somewhat ironically, had everyone been less stubborn last year when |
| 6 |
>> discussing this topic we could have embedded the EAPI in line X of the |
| 7 |
>> ebuild in 2008 and be using it now; instead of still discussing it. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> ...and we wouldn't be able to change the version rules, and we would be |
| 10 |
> suffering a substantial performance hit. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it |
| 13 |
covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too; |
| 14 |
sometimes requirements get dropped. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-A |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -- |
| 20 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 21 |
> |
Archives