Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:37:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090224163726.781bba19@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800 |
| 2 | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it |
| 4 | > covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too; |
| 5 | > sometimes requirements get dropped. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no |
| 8 | need to compromise here. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |