From: | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | ||
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:42:47 | ||
Message-Id: | b41005390902240842s319b0091hb3d47dc8351d48d7@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800 |
4 | > Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
5 | >> Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it |
6 | >> covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too; |
7 | >> sometimes requirements get dropped. |
8 | > |
9 | > We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no |
10 | > need to compromise here. |
11 | |
12 | Two years to argue and implement a solution certainly shouts "compromise" to me. |
13 | |
14 | -A |
15 | |
16 | > |
17 | > -- |
18 | > Ciaran McCreesh |
19 | > |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |