Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:42:47
Message-Id: b41005390902240842s319b0091hb3d47dc8351d48d7@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
2 <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800
4 > Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
5 >> Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it
6 >> covers 80%'. Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too;
7 >> sometimes requirements get dropped.
8 >
9 > We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no
10 > need to compromise here.
11
12 Two years to argue and implement a solution certainly shouts "compromise" to me.
13
14 -A
15
16 >
17 > --
18 > Ciaran McCreesh
19 >

Replies