Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: gentoo@faulhammer.org (Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer)
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Future of tetex
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:41:56
Message-Id: 9+Z4gICSntB@v-li.fqdn.th-h.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Future of tetex by Gabriel Lavoie
1 Tach Gabriel, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
2
3 Gabriel Lavoie schrieb:
4 > About the texmf tree, is there really many packages that would be
5 > included in each distributions? Would a modular ebuild system like the
6 > one used by Gnome (emerge gnome and emerge gnome-lite) and X.org would
7 > be nice for TeXLive? Each packages in the texmf tree could be updated
8 > independently if needed and the packages like beamer could be also
9 > included in the dependencies.
10
11 You know the maintenance that will need? Yearly updates of TeXLive
12 should be sufficient.
13
14
15
16 V-Li
17
18 --
19 Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3
20 http://www.gnupg.org/
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Future of tetex Gabriel Lavoie <glavoie@××××××.net>