| 1 |
On Monday 24 September 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>: |
| 3 |
> > On 09:58 Mon 24 Sep , Christian Faulhammer (opfer) wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > opfer 07/09/24 09:58:29 |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > Modified: ChangeLog |
| 7 |
> > > Added: magicpoint-1.12a.ebuild |
| 8 |
> > > Log: |
| 9 |
> > > version bump, a lot of bugfixes; on Gentoo side we have better |
| 10 |
> > > Emacs support; in total fixing bugs 150312, 83313 and 186754 |
| 11 |
> > > (Portage version: 2.1.3.9) |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > # no parallel make possible! |
| 14 |
> > > make -j1 Makefiles || die "emake failed" |
| 15 |
> > > make clean || die "emake clean failed" |
| 16 |
> > > make BINDIR=/usr/bin LIBDIR=/etc/X11 || die "emake failed" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> [...] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > > make \ |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> [...] |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> > > make \ |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> [...] |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > Why not emake for all of these? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Because it fails, magicpoint's build system is really old and weird. |
| 31 |
> The comment above should state that, but the leftover -j1 I tried would |
| 32 |
> confuse the reader. Plus the stupid die comments. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
most people associate "emake" with "run in parallel" when in reality, that is |
| 35 |
merely one of the things it provides |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
if something doesnt work in parallel, you use `emake -j1` ... using `make` |
| 38 |
generally doesnt make sense anywhere |
| 39 |
-mike |
Archives