| 1 |
El dom, 26-05-2013 a las 08:55 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> > As far as resisting systemd, why is that so bad? Vertical integration is |
| 4 |
> > generally a bad idea with the sole exception of when your use case(s) |
| 5 |
> > line up perfectly with the ivory tower and you need all of the offered |
| 6 |
> > features. If Gentoo falls to systemd, there will literally be no |
| 7 |
> > Linux-based distros left to prevent it from taking over, and as a result |
| 8 |
> > Linux-based systems will become more and more tightly integrated, |
| 9 |
> > killing the choice that Gentoo truly stands for and homogenizing everything. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It is bad because ebuilds are not place to put politics into. If you |
| 12 |
> want to become dev, you should understand this. We are supposed to be |
| 13 |
> serious people. Serious people don't break user systems or refuse to |
| 14 |
> support them in the name of manifesting their wishes. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It is bad because it's not systemd that's losing, it's Gentoo. Except |
| 17 |
> for the fact that there's just a few people that take Gentoo seriously |
| 18 |
> these days. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Upstreams clearly show that they don't care. We can either sit |
| 21 |
> in the corner and resent, or we can work on improving the situation. |
| 22 |
> And going on flamewars or manifestations doesn't really improve |
| 23 |
> anything, you should know that by now. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It's also bad because you are affecting to a lot of people that can/want |
| 27 |
to use systemd, forcing you to have semi-usable setups because of your |
| 28 |
personal preferences. |
Archives