Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: dlcampbell@×××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 07:00:18
Message-Id: 20130526085538.42214885@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) by Daniel Campbell
1 On Sun, 26 May 2013 01:24:03 -0500
2 Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell@×××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On 05/25/2013 02:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
5 > > We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not
6 > > providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd
7 > > integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I
8 > > don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding
9 > > unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier,
10 > > regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space
11 > > aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering
12 > > ebuilds with USE flags.
13 > >
14 > > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting
15 > > out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I
16 > > would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test.
17 >
18 > I'm not a dev (though I would like to be...), but consider me interested
19 > in testing an opt-out method as well. I'm going to try INSTALL_MASK and
20 > see what happens. I'm not sure if any of my packages have systemd units
21 > yet, though.
22
23 Please fix your e-mail client to send replies to the mail you are
24 replying it, instead of the top mail in the thread.
25
26 > As far as resisting systemd, why is that so bad? Vertical integration is
27 > generally a bad idea with the sole exception of when your use case(s)
28 > line up perfectly with the ivory tower and you need all of the offered
29 > features. If Gentoo falls to systemd, there will literally be no
30 > Linux-based distros left to prevent it from taking over, and as a result
31 > Linux-based systems will become more and more tightly integrated,
32 > killing the choice that Gentoo truly stands for and homogenizing everything.
33
34 It is bad because ebuilds are not place to put politics into. If you
35 want to become dev, you should understand this. We are supposed to be
36 serious people. Serious people don't break user systems or refuse to
37 support them in the name of manifesting their wishes.
38
39 It is bad because it's not systemd that's losing, it's Gentoo. Except
40 for the fact that there's just a few people that take Gentoo seriously
41 these days.
42
43 Upstreams clearly show that they don't care. We can either sit
44 in the corner and resent, or we can work on improving the situation.
45 And going on flamewars or manifestations doesn't really improve
46 anything, you should know that by now.
47
48 --
49 Best regards,
50 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies