| 1 |
On 2015-01-19 07:28, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/19/15 17:47, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:35:09 +0800 |
| 4 |
> > Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >> * AutoRepoman catches on average maybe 2 user-visible breakages. |
| 7 |
> >> Mostly removing stable on HPPA ;) |
| 8 |
> >> Fix: Make repoman faster (tree-wide scans take ~2 CPU-hours) |
| 9 |
> >> Fix: Remind people that using repoman is not optional |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > repoman doesn't check reverse dependencies for the package you're |
| 12 |
> > working on. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> If it were fast enough we could do that. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> pcheck from pkgcore was at one point down to under 3 minutes for a full |
| 17 |
> tree scan, that's pretty much "fast enough" so that people could run it |
| 18 |
> on almost every ebuild removal. repoman takes around 30 minutes when |
| 19 |
> parallelized, on the fastest hardware I currently have access to. Or |
| 20 |
> about 2 CPU-hours with a single thread ... that's prohibitively slow. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'd be interested to hear if pcheck has regressed significantly at all |
| 23 |
for you when running it now on a similar set up. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Tim |
Archives