Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 22:15:00
Message-Id: 463D00A1.5000103@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
2 > On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200
3 > Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o> wrote:
4 >> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>> and who knows what news item delivery looks like?
6 >> Irrelevant, what it looks like has nothing to do with whether or not
7 >> it is critical.
8 >
9 > No no, it matters. The degree to which an unnecessary news item would
10 > inconvenience the end user is relevant in making the decision.
11
12 Eh, something being inconvenient doesn't make the thing any more or less
13 critical, so yeah, it's entirely irrelevant.
14
15
16 --
17 Best regards,
18
19 Jakub Moc
20 mailto:jakub@g.o
21 GPG signature:
22 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
23 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
24
25 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>