Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 22:25:02
Message-Id: 20070505232103.596eddc1@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 by Jakub Moc
1 On Sun, 06 May 2007 00:09:37 +0200
2 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
3 > Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
4 > > On Sat, 5 May 2007 23:48:31 +0200
5 > > Maurice van der Pot <griffon26@g.o> wrote:
6 > >> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:26:50PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
7 > >>> and who knows what news item delivery looks like?
8 > >> Irrelevant, what it looks like has nothing to do with whether or
9 > >> not it is critical.
10 > >
11 > > No no, it matters. The degree to which an unnecessary news item
12 > > would inconvenience the end user is relevant in making the decision.
13 >
14 > Eh, something being inconvenient doesn't make the thing any more or
15 > less critical, so yeah, it's entirely irrelevant.
16
17 No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the entire
18 point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering what's best
19 for affected users.
20
21 --
22 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 expose@×××××××××××.net
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>