Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: expose@×××××××××××.net
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 22:33:45
Message-Id: 200705060030.28168.expose@luftgetrock.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the entire
3 > point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering what's best
4 > for affected users.
5 No it is not.
6 It is about wether or not this news item would fit into the current set of
7 rules, which it would not.
8 If you do not like the fact that news items are for critical issues only, use
9 something else, or kindly ask for a change for the GLEP.
10
11 As in the long run, violating self-set rules will for sure not be beneficial
12 for the "user experience".
13 There is not reason to start doing so now because of a news item you
14 requested.
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>