| 1 |
On Sun, 6 May 2007 00:30:28 +0200 |
| 2 |
expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > No, but it affects the impact upon user experience, which is the |
| 5 |
> > entire point of the process. This is, after all, about delivering |
| 6 |
> > what's best for affected users. |
| 7 |
> No it is not. |
| 8 |
> It is about wether or not this news item would fit into the current |
| 9 |
> set of rules, which it would not. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So you're saying that you're attempting to use wording technicalities |
| 12 |
to prevent an improvement to the user experience? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> As in the long run, violating self-set rules will for sure not be |
| 15 |
> beneficial for the "user experience". |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The whole point of GLEP 42 is to improve the user experience. The whole |
| 18 |
point of the word 'critical' is to avoid having GLEP 42 used for items |
| 19 |
that are not relevant to most targetted users -- that is, messages like |
| 20 |
"There is a new foo USE flag that enables the fancy new foo behaviour". |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives