| 1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> This is an announcement that =net-nds/openldap-2.1* is going into p.mask |
| 5 |
> now, and will be removed in 30 days. It contains security |
| 6 |
> vulnerabilities that have been fixed in new major versions from |
| 7 |
> upstream, and upstream no longer provides support for it. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> In the same vein, =net-nds/openldap-2.2* will go into p.mask August 1st, |
| 10 |
> and be removed September 1st, in line with upstream discontinuing |
| 11 |
> their long-term support for it and releasing the 2.4 series. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Er. Granted, they're out of date, because we don't have anyone who knows |
| 15 |
ldap (and gongloo never showed up with a promised rewrite), but all of |
| 16 |
our documentation seems to be geared toward openldap-2.1 or so. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml --> is still considered |
| 19 |
"valid" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldap-howto.xml --> is considered |
| 22 |
unmaintained and "invalid", since none of the GDP knows ldap. wouldn't |
| 23 |
mind reinstating it if we can get users to help out with the updates. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Otherwise, we'll probably have to remove all the existing LDAP |
| 26 |
documentation, which is disappointing. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Quick, anyone want to help out with the documents and update them for |
| 29 |
the current way of doing LDAP? :) |
Archives