| 1 |
On 10/31/06, Stephen P. Becker <geoman@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> You do realize that Ciaran *was* a member of several arch teams, right? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Of course. But "was" _is_ the operative word. It's not like I'm |
| 5 |
asking for him to be banned from the Gentoo mailing lists or anything. |
| 6 |
Chill, ffs. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Arch team leaders set policy on this issues, not Ciaran. It's useful |
| 9 |
for developers (especially ones who have joined Gentoo since Ciaran |
| 10 |
was expelled) to be clear on what the arch team policies actually are. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I would agree with pretty much everything he has said on this topic. |
| 13 |
> Perhaps you should consider that the reason that not many arch team |
| 14 |
> folks have chipped in is because we agree with him. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
All I'm asking is for arch team leaders to say so. It's hardly |
| 17 |
unreasonable or controversial to ask that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Don't dismiss his |
| 20 |
> responses as noise from some random "Gentoo user" who has no idea what |
| 21 |
> they are talking about. You should know better then that Stuart. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm not dismissing his responses. I'm just asking for arch team |
| 24 |
leaders (which is who the questions in this thread were addressed to) |
| 25 |
to chip in, tis all. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Which, I'm glad to say, they've been happy to do. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Stu |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives