Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:09:57
Message-Id: 454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Stuart Herbert
1 Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > On 10/31/06, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote:
3 >> Uh, security bugs are not the highest priority.
4 >
5 > Would it be possible to have some arch team leaders join in this
6 > debate? Atm, it just seems to be bouncing back and forwards between
7 > package maintainers asking questions, and a Gentoo user filling the
8 > void left by the responses from the arch team folks.
9
10 You do realize that Ciaran *was* a member of several arch teams, right?
11 I would agree with pretty much everything he has said on this topic.
12 Perhaps you should consider that the reason that not many arch team
13 folks have chipped in is because we agree with him. Don't dismiss his
14 responses as noise from some random "Gentoo user" who has no idea what
15 they are talking about. You should know better then that Stuart.
16
17
18 > (Or, to put it another way, I'm not sure anyone's actually learning
19 > anything here, except for Ciaran's personal opinions on how he'd like
20 > things to be).
21
22 Or, to put it this way, I'm not sure anyone is actually getting the
23 point, simply because they would rather stick their heads in the sand
24 instead of actually listening to something Ciaran has to say.
25
26 -Steve
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees "Paweł Madej" <linux@××××××××.info>