1 |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 12:56:18 +1000 |
2 |
Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Sorry, I thought this thread was about whether to keep or discontinue |
5 |
> the separation between stable and testing branches. |
6 |
|
7 |
Yes and it was others that said lack of stable would effect |
8 |
enterprise/professional usage. I simply said that argument was moot as |
9 |
there are other objections beyond not having stable. |
10 |
|
11 |
Most I know would say Gentoo as a whole is not stable, regardless of |
12 |
any stable packages, branch, etc. They do not consider Gentoo stable. |
13 |
|
14 |
FYI, I have always run Gentoo for professional usage. I have a |
15 |
business. My business has always run Gentoo on all servers, desktops, |
16 |
workstations etc. Those locally who have worked for me and in my LUG |
17 |
know this fact. I have also interviewed with many companies in the US |
18 |
who either did run Gentoo or still do. Thus I have some directly |
19 |
knowledge on that shrinking market. |
20 |
|
21 |
Beyond my opinion, gentoo -debian - suse -redhat |
22 |
https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=gentoo+-debian+-suse+-redhat&l= |
23 |
|
24 |
Very few if any are after Gentoo skills. Change that to any other |
25 |
distro and see the difference. Of course Gentoo is always mentioned |
26 |
with others, but are they running Gentoo is the question. Seeking |
27 |
Gentoo skills and companies running Gentoo are not the same. |
28 |
|
29 |
gentoo |
30 |
https://www.indeed.com/jobs?q=gentoo+&l= |
31 |
|
32 |
It is always lumped in with others, rarely by itself. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |