| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:44:58PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:28:31 +1000 |
| 3 |
> Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to make Gentoo *more* attractive to run in |
| 6 |
> > corporate environments, rather than simply saying "We're not RHEL so |
| 7 |
> > why bother"? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> No disagreement. That has always been my interest. Though has not been |
| 10 |
> others. It was in part why I became a trustee. For things like vendor |
| 11 |
> certified hardware, looking into certifications, events, and a whole |
| 12 |
> lot more. But people rather lambast, insult, and stand in the way rather |
| 13 |
> than either get out of the way or work with me. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It surely could happen without me but has not. I am definitely not |
| 16 |
> against such happening. But it would require tremendous change and |
| 17 |
> leadership. Which I do not see ever changing. I wish things were |
| 18 |
> otherwise. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > People do use Gentoo in production environments, both personally and |
| 21 |
> > professionally, even if it is those that have more investment in doing |
| 22 |
> > so than the average IT Joe. By removing stable, we would be reducing |
| 23 |
> > the potential arguments for the few who do want to use Gentoo in that |
| 24 |
> > sort of environment. We would be becoming more of a niche distro. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Preaching to the choir. That is not why companies I know who ran Gentoo |
| 27 |
> are leaving or left. One told me they did not want to be in the |
| 28 |
> operating system business. Stable or not, there are fewer companies |
| 29 |
> running Gentoo that were before. Due to other reasons that are not |
| 30 |
> changing, culture, etc. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Companies that run it today I doubt would change if stable went away. |
| 33 |
> If they left Gentoo, they have many reasons far beyond lack of a stable |
| 34 |
> branch/tree. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> > "Hey, lets try Gentoo - it's really configurable." |
| 37 |
> > "What's their stable policy? How often does it break?" |
| 38 |
> > "Stable? What's that?" |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> How about no foundation. Not even a legal entity. No certifications |
| 41 |
> from vendors, nor for employees. No one to hire for official support. |
| 42 |
> There are so many things far beyond anything having to do with a stable |
| 43 |
> tree or not. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Sorry, I thought this thread was about whether to keep or discontinue |
| 46 |
the separation between stable and testing branches. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
Sam Jorna (wraeth) |
| 50 |
GnuPG Key: D6180C26 |
Archives