1 |
On Fri, 23 May 2003 21:15:07 +0900 |
2 |
Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Henti Smith wrote: |
5 |
> > I agree .... if this was that case I would still be using slackware or |
6 |
> > something since I can "update" the packaes I have installed when "needed" I |
7 |
> > use gentoo so I can get the latest mplayer a few days after it comes out etc |
8 |
> > etc |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > otherwise whats the point of having gentoo and portage .. ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That's one thing I hear lots of people pointing as a downside of gentoo. In an |
13 |
> attempt to have the newest packages it happens that even the stable ones are |
14 |
> not stable enough. |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't mind unstable stuff ... before gentoo I compiled everything myself as well |
17 |
and I run my system as ~x86 and I edit packages.mask and have portage overlay for my own bumps thats not in |
18 |
portage yet. |
19 |
|
20 |
> I thought the idea of portage is the ability to compile the packages any way |
21 |
> you want, not necessarily to have the newest one a few days after it's out. |
22 |
|
23 |
There are many sides to what gentoo offers .. for me personally .. it's the fact that I can install the latest stuff to play with |
24 |
and I don't have to worry about dependancies ... if there is a problem .. I write my own ebuilds to do what I want and sort it out and |
25 |
submit it .. |
26 |
|
27 |
> Otherwize, even RedHat had pretty fresh packages in its Rawhide for the |
28 |
> adventurous. And not that late after the official release at all. |
29 |
|
30 |
I like to compile stuff ;P |
31 |
|
32 |
Henti |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |