Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 12:15:10
Message-Id: 20030523121507.GA25407%chutz@gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes by Henti Smith
1 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Henti Smith wrote:
2 > I agree .... if this was that case I would still be using slackware or
3 > something since I can "update" the packaes I have installed when "needed" I
4 > use gentoo so I can get the latest mplayer a few days after it comes out etc
5 > etc
6 >
7 > otherwise whats the point of having gentoo and portage .. ?
8
9 That's one thing I hear lots of people pointing as a downside of gentoo. In an
10 attempt to have the newest packages it happens that even the stable ones are
11 not stable enough.
12
13 I thought the idea of portage is the ability to compile the packages any way
14 you want, not necessarily to have the newest one a few days after it's out.
15
16 Otherwize, even RedHat had pretty fresh packages in its Rawhide for the
17 adventurous. And not that late after the official release at all.
18
19 --
20 /^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\/^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\
21 / Georgi Georgiev (-< / When I was 16, I thought there \
22 \ chutz@×××××××.net /\ .o)\ was no hope for my father. By /
23 / +81(90)6266-1163 V_/_ |(/)/ the time I was 20, he had made \
24 \ ^^^^^^^^^\ great improvement. /
25 \___________________________/\________________________________/
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za>
Re: [gentoo-dev] common ebuild mistakes Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>