| 1 |
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:15:07PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:52:32PM +0200, Henti Smith wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I agree .... if this was that case I would still be using slackware or |
| 4 |
> > something since I can "update" the packaes I have installed when "needed" I |
| 5 |
> > use gentoo so I can get the latest mplayer a few days after it comes out etc |
| 6 |
> > etc |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > otherwise whats the point of having gentoo and portage .. ? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's one thing I hear lots of people pointing as a downside of gentoo. In an |
| 11 |
> attempt to have the newest packages it happens that even the stable ones are |
| 12 |
> not stable enough. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I thought the idea of portage is the ability to compile the packages any way |
| 15 |
> you want, not necessarily to have the newest one a few days after it's out. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Otherwize, even RedHat had pretty fresh packages in its Rawhide for the |
| 18 |
> adventurous. And not that late after the official release at all. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
We want our ~arch keyworded ebuilds to be as up to date as possible. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 25 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives