| 1 |
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:12:20 +0000 |
| 2 |
Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> XML! Actually, no. For me, libconfig[1] turned out to be very easy |
| 7 |
> >> to work with. Its config file format is easy to write by hand and |
| 8 |
> >> the parser resides in the library. |
| 9 |
> >> [1] http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/libconfig.html |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > On a simialr note there's libconfuse[1], which uses one of the most |
| 12 |
> > common formats available: ini-like :) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > [1] http://www.nongnu.org/confuse/ |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Woah, they both look nice. I note libConfuse hasn't been dev'ed for a |
| 17 |
> couple of years, not a big issue. libconfig is "25K for the stripped |
| 18 |
> C shared library" - neither is on my system atm; from the pkg size |
| 19 |
> i'm guessing libConfuse isn't much bigger. I guess having a C++ |
| 20 |
> library as well helps libconfig tho. I like its format better as |
| 21 |
> well ;) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
All very nice, but our init scripts and config files for them should be |
| 24 |
POSIX shell compliant. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If we move our network configuration to something other then shell then |
| 27 |
I guess we could look at this. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Roy |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives