1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Duncan wrote: |
4 |
> Samuli Suominen posted on Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:32:22 +0200 as excerpted: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > imho we should contact the sysrescuecd developers and suggest more close |
7 |
> > cooperation, such that it could be called official install media in |
8 |
> > gentoo-terms |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I've wondered for years why gentoo invests all that effort into creating |
11 |
> its own install media, when there's many dedicated projects out there |
12 |
> whose whole purpose is live install/rescue media. It has always seemed |
13 |
> to me that we'd be better off simply using one of them and saving the |
14 |
> effort for something closer to our core competency/mission. |
15 |
|
16 |
SysRescueCD does not exist for the fringe architectures. When we |
17 |
first built the install media, the only alternative that was |
18 |
somewhat reliable was Knoppix -- which in turn had its own |
19 |
problems during the x86/amd64 days. So we built our own. |
20 |
|
21 |
I'll say it again: if we don't make install media anymore and |
22 |
tell people to use SRCD instead, we will lose installation |
23 |
support for at least alpha, ppc/64, hppa and ia64. As for sparc, |
24 |
mips and arm, there _might_ be alternatives, but I'm not aware of |
25 |
them. |
26 |
|
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Tobias |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
"Brain, konban wa nani o shimashitai?" |
33 |
"Your Japanese is terrible, Pinky." |