| 1 |
nop, have not tryed 3.1 myself, but i am planing to ... was just |
| 2 |
wondering whats the current status. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Regards |
| 5 |
Milos |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Tue, 21 May 2002 03:02:01 +0200 |
| 8 |
Spider <spider@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> begin quote |
| 13 |
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 10:24:48 +1200 |
| 14 |
> Milos Negovanovic <milosn@××××××××××××.nz> wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > Hello again, |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > when can we expect switch to gcc3?...just curious |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Regards |
| 21 |
> > Milos |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> bootstrapping with gcc 3.1 now works (as of -r1) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> texinfo 4.2 cleanout is on my "to do" list |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> PreZ should have perl fixed tonight |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> XFree86 4.2 is next in line to get fixed. ( currently generates internal |
| 31 |
> compiler error if no warnings, and if -Wall you get a loooot of missing |
| 32 |
> files.) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Status updated. did you even care to check the gcc 3.1 - what breaks |
| 36 |
> thread? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> //Spider |
| 39 |
> -- |
| 40 |
> begin .signature |
| 41 |
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 42 |
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 43 |
> end |
| 44 |
> |
Archives