| 1 |
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 15:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 09:26, Corey Shields wrote: |
| 3 |
> > There is no release for this at all.. We can use the same release cd's |
| 4 |
> > that are currently available. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I still don't see the advantage of 2 release cycles. I honestly feel |
| 7 |
> like our current quarterly release cycles are a bit ambitious. Adding |
| 8 |
> any other release cycles into this mix would simply be overwhelming for |
| 9 |
> our staff. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Why not merge the cycles? Once per year (or whatever is decided) the media |
| 12 |
release (like current releases) coincides with the release of the |
| 13 |
stable/release tree. The other media releases will be similar, but the tree |
| 14 |
will not be maintained or provided as release. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Paul |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
ps. The difference for the installation medium between a release current style |
| 19 |
and a stable release could just be the profile provided. (The profile taking |
| 20 |
care of the different tree etc.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
pps. Of course it could also be done in the manual |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 26 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 27 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 28 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives