| 1 |
Le mardi 18 septembre 2012 à 10:05 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:55:16 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Le samedi 08 septembre 2012 à 20:29 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 10:37:49 -0700 |
| 7 |
> > > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > > i'm surprised this hasn't happened already. currently at 18 users |
| 10 |
> > > > (and i'm adding another), so time to make global. i'll use the |
| 11 |
> > > > description: |
| 12 |
> > > > upnp: Enable support for the Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) |
| 13 |
> > > > network protocol |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Not sure about that description. It's whole stack of protocols which |
| 16 |
> > > usually benefit from more refined description. |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > > On the other hand, the local descriptions in the tree show that some |
| 19 |
> > > people simply don't care and you are guessing what it does anyway... |
| 20 |
> > > |
| 21 |
> > "Enable support for DLNA/UPnP" seems a good enough description. People |
| 22 |
> > that care about it most likely will know two things about it: |
| 23 |
> > * opens up ports on the router for torrents/games |
| 24 |
> > * makes PC talk to TV/console for audio/video |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> But these are two distinct things. The first one may be useful for me, |
| 27 |
> the second one won't. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Let me just say that as a user, concerning this technology aggregate, I |
| 30 |
really don't care, it has to "just work" :). Now if you gather enough |
| 31 |
momentum to split this flag and make other people on this list agree |
| 32 |
with you, I'll be just fine with it :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 36 |
Gentoo |
Archives