| 1 |
On 18/09/2012 16:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 2 |
> Let me just say that as a user, concerning this technology aggregate, I |
| 3 |
> really don't care, it has to "just work" :). Now if you gather enough |
| 4 |
> momentum to split this flag and make other people on this list agree |
| 5 |
> with you, I'll be just fine with it :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'd be positive to splitting them. Especially because for instance in an |
| 8 |
office you might care about port forwarding but won't care about DLNA. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Speaking of which, renaming (where applicable) upnp to dlna might be |
| 11 |
more user friendly since usually you have the feature _advertised_ as |
| 12 |
DLNA, not as UPnP! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 16 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives