Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs

[Gilles Dartiguelongue]

Le dimanche 19 mai 2013 à 17:00 -0700, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." a écrit :
> On 5/19/13 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
> > ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
> > flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
>
> Hey Jeroen, apologies if I have ignored any of your feedback.
>
> I'm indeed behind on bugmail (5000 unread emails, how about that?).

That would explain why you're still filling gnome stabilization bugs
while we replied many times we don't want them in their current form ?

>
> I do read mailing list traffic and direct e-mail though.
>
> > We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an
> > atom, if possible, and explain the action later.
>
> Could you refer me to the part where "we agreed" and why? I'm actually
> happy to make changes that are useful for people, but without a good
> rationale and an _actual_ consensus someone else will inevitably come
> and says he likes the old way better.
>

This was discussed on the mailing list a couple of times. Last big
thread related to this was automatic bug assignment iirc.

This generally needs to go first so sorting by summary shows your
packages in order and you have a chance to see this part of the summary
in bugzilla (with version optionally), the rest of the summary line is
imho less important when working through the web interface.

> Remember this is supposed to _help_ Gentoo. You can opt out of the bugs
> (there is a package name and maintainer name regex in the script). You
> don't need to "hunt them down" - if you do nothing another script will
> just CC arches after 30 days.

I'll repeat gnome team position here:

We do not want automated stabilization requests.

We handle so many packages that having individual bug reports is driving
arch teams and us crazy.

We have our own set of scripts to do batch stabilization bug reports.
They were designed with arch teams so that it does not generate too much
load on them.

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o>
Gentoo