Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs

On 5/20/13 5:10 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> That would explain why you're still filling gnome stabilization bugs
> while we replied many times we don't want them in their current form ?

If you're still getting bugs from my script it's a bug in my script,
sorry about that. Could you post the most recent example of such a bug?

The script applies exclusion list into account since
<http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c20e14c939bf0efa495dead6243f8035d699b86>
(Feb 2013) and gnome is part of the exclusion list since
<http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=commitdiff;h=f63c885b61c46482781e22fb6f117f110eada79d>
(Aug 2012).

> This generally needs to go first so sorting by summary shows your
> packages in order and you have a chance to see this part of the summary
> in bugzilla (with version optionally), the rest of the summary line is
> imho less important when working through the web interface.

This makes sense. I'll post an update when I make this simple change to
the script.

Paweł