| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview, |
| 7 |
>>>however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of |
| 8 |
>>>attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>One of my blog entries was also over-interpreted and included in the |
| 11 |
>>GWN without consulting me first, causing a mail storm in my inbox from |
| 12 |
>>angry users of xsupplicant: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> If errors in the GWN result in large numbers of emails directly to you |
| 16 |
> rather than to the GWN, maybe the developer's email link shouldn't be |
| 17 |
> included in articles and feedback should instead be linked to gwn-feedback. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The GWN is a fairly independent publication, so I think it should be |
| 20 |
> free to make its own mistakes as long as it retains journalistic |
| 21 |
> integrity. But perhaps it could benefit from some sort of advisory board |
| 22 |
> of Gentoo developers/staff? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Er the GWN is currently a Gentoo Project. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/pr/gwn.xml |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Although apparently the project page needs updating ;) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Thanks, |
| 32 |
> Donnie |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives