1 |
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
3 |
>> To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview, |
4 |
>> however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of |
5 |
>> attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> One of my blog entries was also over-interpreted and included in the |
8 |
> GWN without consulting me first, causing a mail storm in my inbox from |
9 |
> angry users of xsupplicant: |
10 |
|
11 |
If errors in the GWN result in large numbers of emails directly to you |
12 |
rather than to the GWN, maybe the developer's email link shouldn't be |
13 |
included in articles and feedback should instead be linked to gwn-feedback. |
14 |
|
15 |
The GWN is a fairly independent publication, so I think it should be |
16 |
free to make its own mistakes as long as it retains journalistic |
17 |
integrity. But perhaps it could benefit from some sort of advisory board |
18 |
of Gentoo developers/staff? |
19 |
|
20 |
Thanks, |
21 |
Donnie |