| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 4 |
> Tobias Klausmann <klausman@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea |
| 7 |
> > > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name |
| 8 |
> > > > will speak by itself. |
| 9 |
> > > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. |
| 10 |
> > > Anyone? |
| 11 |
> > As long as the description of the USE flag (such as by euse -i) |
| 12 |
> > is usefule (and *not* the equally omnipresentand useless "foo - |
| 13 |
> > enables foo support"), I see no trouble in using it. |
| 14 |
> > In this case I'd go for: |
| 15 |
> > kpathsea - Enable (La)TeX integration. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Which I don't consider as correct: "enable integration with kpathsea |
| 18 |
> search library (TeX related)" |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > IMHO, it'd better be "Support X11 DGA video output using the |
| 21 |
> > vidix interface" |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Right, we have too many bad descriptions. Maybe a project for you |
| 24 |
> to prepare a patch for use*.desc? :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Actually, I might consider it. Unfortunately, I tried to cut off |
| 27 |
my finger last sunday and as such I'm typing-impaired for now. At |
| 28 |
least I got sick leave until Friday :-/ And two nasty tetanus |
| 29 |
shots :-( <cue more whining, I'm too lazy to type> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Anyway, I'm considering your "offer" :) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
Tobias |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
In the future, everyone will be anonymous for 15 minutes. |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives