| 1 |
Tobias Klausmann <klausman@××××××××××××.de>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea |
| 5 |
> > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name |
| 6 |
> > > will speak by itself. |
| 7 |
> > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. |
| 8 |
> > Anyone? |
| 9 |
> As long as the description of the USE flag (such as by euse -i) |
| 10 |
> is usefule (and *not* the equally omnipresentand useless "foo - |
| 11 |
> enables foo support"), I see no trouble in using it. |
| 12 |
> In this case I'd go for: |
| 13 |
> kpathsea - Enable (La)TeX integration. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Which I don't consider as correct: "enable integration with kpathsea |
| 16 |
search library (TeX related)" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> IMHO, it'd better be "Support X11 DGA video output using the |
| 19 |
> vidix interface" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Right, we have too many bad descriptions. Maybe a project for you |
| 22 |
to prepare a patch for use*.desc? :) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
V-Li |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 28 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives