Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: opfer@gentoo.org (Christian Faulhammer)
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on sys-apps/portage
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 08:42:37
Message-Id: A6ayoUn6eKB@v-li.fqdn.th-h.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies on sys-apps/portage by Stephen Bennett
1 Tach Stephen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
2
3 Stephen Bennett schrieb:
4 > On which note, the current base profile specifies portage-2.0.51.22 or
5 > later -- can anyone see a reason not to require 2.1? There are a lot of
6 > packages that dep on portage-2.1 for the "wrong" reasons above, which
7 > I'd like to be able to clean up.
8
9 I maintain the three ELOG viewers app-portage/
10 {elogviewer,kelogviewer,elgov} which need the ELOG feature found in
11 Portage 2.1. So I think a dependency on that version is ok, as long as it
12 isn't in base-profile.
13
14
15 V-Li
16
17 --
18 Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3
19 http://www.gnupg.org/
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dependencies on sys-apps/portage Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o>