| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 21:17:55 +0200 |
| 2 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> No, these packages are available to paludis, but not to portage. |
| 5 |
> Basically making a case for the use of paludis. I don't think that |
| 6 |
> the decision to replace portage should be made in that way. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
To reiterate here, we're not proposing introducing any paludis-specific |
| 9 |
features into ebuilds. Only profiles, and those profiles wouldn't |
| 10 |
provide anything that would provide users who wouldn't otherwise want |
| 11 |
to use paludis with any incentive to switch. |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives