Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:05:37
Message-Id: 20061031150236.7b080211@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by "Paweł Madej"
1 On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:57:01 +0100 Paweł Madej <linux@××××××××.info>
2 wrote:
3 | I'm not a dev but I suppose i got resolution for that problem. Lets
4 | make another subproject (don't know how to name it properly) in
5 | bugzilla in which there will be only bugs affected by security flaw.
6 | That bugs will have highest priority from every other ones. And devs
7 | would have to look at them firstly
8
9 Uh, security bugs are not the highest priority.
10
11 --
12 Ciaran McCreesh
13 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
14 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
15 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>