Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Madej" <linux@××××××××.info>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:00:13
Message-Id: 200610310857.02169.linux@quanteam.info
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Dnia wtorek, 31 pa¼dziernika 2006 01:33, Ciaran McCreesh napisa³:
2 > The thing is, at any given time there are probably a hundred or more
3 > bugs assigned to arch teams with people whining for attention. At least
4 > two thirds of those whines are unhelpful and serve no purpose.
5 > Filtering out the legitimate calls for attention would take even more
6 > time away from fixing the things.
7 >
8 > So, unless you can recruit somebody *good* to let the arch teams know
9 > which bugs should be prioritised, the only thing that increasing
10 > communication would do is decrease the number of bugs that get fixed.
11
12 I'm not a dev but I suppose i got resolution for that problem. Lets make
13 another subproject (don't know how to name it properly) in bugzilla in which
14 there will be only bugs affected by security flaw. That bugs will have
15 highest priority from every other ones. And devs would have to look at them
16 firstly
17
18 --
19 Pawe³ Madej (Nysander)
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees David Shakaryan <omp@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>