Archives
Archives
| From: | David Shakaryan <omp@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | ||
| Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:12:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 454703FC.6000101@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by "Paweł Madej" |
||
| 1 | Paweł Madej wrote: |
| 2 | > I'm not a dev but I suppose i got resolution for that problem. Lets make |
| 3 | > another subproject (don't know how to name it properly) in bugzilla in which |
| 4 | > there will be only bugs affected by security flaw. That bugs will have |
| 5 | > highest priority from every other ones. And devs would have to look at them |
| 6 | > firstly |
| 7 | |
| 8 | What's wrong with simply setting high priority or severity on a bug like |
| 9 | you can currently do? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | David Shakaryan |
| 13 | GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE14B |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | "Paweł Madej" <linux@××××××××.info> |